The Philosophy of Global Warming

If you are interested in the relationship between the human species and the rest of life on Earth, individual and collective human purpose, evolution, cosmology, the nature of reality, astrology, spirituality, and how all of this relates to global warming & the environmental crisis of modernity, then I am sure that you will like my new book 'The Philosophy of Global Warming'. In the post below I have provided the book description, the list of contents and the first two sections of the book. You can find out how to get hold of the book by clicking on this link:

The Philosophy of Global Warming

Tuesday, 28 January 2014

Two Categories of Environmental Problems

Today I would like to elucidate the relationship between technology and the environmental crisis. I will outline the three stages of the technological birthing process. I will then explain why there are two categories of environmental problems, which are delineated by the role that technology plays in solving environmental problems.


In my philosophy I refer to technology as a ‘package deal’. When life on a planet becomes technological it gains immense benefits but it also has to endure a painful period of technological birthing in which technology brings a great number of harms. These harms are the ‘price to pay’ for the much greater immense benefits which technology brings. We can think of the technological birthing process as having three stages.
In the first stage technology brings both widespread benefits and harms which affect both humans and non-human life. These are very varied; the benefits include medical technologies which can save the lives of human and non-human life-forms and telecommunications technologies which enable humans to communicate more efficiently; the harms include illness caused by technological pollution and the deaths of multitudes of human and non-life-forms due to the operations of, and accidents involved in, the use of cars, buses, airplanes and a plethora of other technologies. In this stage it is not clear whether overall technology is ‘good’ or ‘bad’.

In the second stage the technological birthing process reaches its fruition and the immense benefits of technology for planetary life manifest themselves. It is now clear that overall technology has immense benefits.

In the third stage the harms caused by technology are reduced as humans learn to reign in the dangers of various technologies through greater understanding, better design and wiser deployment. These three stages can be thought of as the unfolding of the technological ‘package deal’.

The environmental problems that constitute the environmental crisis can also be thought of as a ‘package deal’. This is because when life becomes technological a vast array of environmental problems will arise, and these problems have the same (technological) cause. However, there is a widespread tendency to mentally package all environmental issues into a single category and assume that they all have the same kind of solution. At one extreme there are a great many people who believe that, when it comes to environmental issues, technology and human intervention are both wholly bad; for these people the solution to all environmental problems involves reducing technological deployment/human intervention. You will hear these people say things like: “How could the solution to a problem possibly be more of what caused the problem?!” At the other extreme are those who believe that technology provides the solution to all environmental problems; for these people the solution to all environmental problems is more of what caused the problem in the first place.
I am convinced that these two extreme views, which are surprisingly common and widespread, are both wrong. We shouldn’t put all environmental problems into a single category and then adopt a blanket view concerning whether or not technology is the solution. The first thing that we need to do is to create two categories of environmental problems. The first category contains human-induced global warming. The second category contains all of the other environmental problems. This division is a central part of my philosophy. The basis of this division is that the only solution to the first category problem is a technological solution. In contrast, all of the second category environmental problems could have either a technological or a non-technological solution. In this category there is scope for choice; we can ponder: “Shall we aim for a technological solution, a non-technological solution, or a mixture of the two, for this particular environmental problem?” We have no such choice when it comes to the realm of global warming – the environmental problem that is human-induced global warming in tandem with non-human induced global warming. To this problem, there is ultimately, at the end of the day, only a technological solution.